About your Search

20130801
20130831
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5
of control. i still think that nsa has got this whole scandal beat. why is no one investigating them for nonsense they are doing today, and spending this time going after a bank for a meltdown that happened oh, i think i it was -- 5 years ago! n. one bucket of data for everyone on the plan, unlimited talk and text on smart phones. now, eryone's in the spirit of sharing. hey, can i borrow your boat this weekend? no. [ male announcer ] share more. save more. at&t mobile share for business. ♪ neil: all right, well, better late than never, did you ask yourself why now? why a sudden interest in going after banks 5 years after the great meltdown. not a peep about going after nsa for surviolence abuses that keep piling up. it was collecting thousands of everybody mails from ordinary americans, with zero terror ties, es nada, zilch, zippo, yikes, that is what mike buc huck abby said. this is happening now. these -- these abuses grow by almost the hour, we're going back in time. i just think we have it backwards. >> if you remember the enemy of the state, with gene hackman and will smith, a
but i will follow you home, i haveny own nsa system. >> doubling minimum wage to 15 bucks an hour and fast, unions working with them, planning for strikes for higher wages beginning next week, fast-food is focus, but just ask walt, if walmart, if you are a big company you have to pay it to or eat it. walmart saying no in washington tc, walmart said it could not afford on stick around, it took a hike. the $15 thing comes to pass, walmart will not belowly one getting out. he said this much bigger than burger joins. ed it is getting to be sort of like a national cause celeb, one goosed by a mean stream media that is not good at math. >> i have seen this cycle over the years. one thing you need to know about minimum wage, it was designed for entry level jobs to teach peoplesoft work skills. it was never meant to be a career. it is men to be a career starter. this campaign going on right now, is driven in my thoughts by the parties the political parties particularly democrats. because all about union dues, not about the minimum wage. just stop and think about how inflationary it is, th
neil: now we can safely say the nsa more than just kind of broke the law. try thousands of times. welcome, everybody. i'm neil cavuto. not just fine. don't take it for me. take it from despise himself. an internal audit out of no less than the national security agency it's often define 200776 violations of established court orders regarding surveillance on americans, are targets in this country. with the nsa demands in a speech read what anyone else would call ridiculous. hundreds of cases of supposedly unintended interception of u.s. e-mail and phone calls and typographical errors that prompted overly aggressive searches. this group for one thing, not responding to them or even reporting them is quite another. it's not only sloppy but illegal and now we come to find that the smartest intelligence surveillance court that is supposed to keep an eye on them to not even learn about some of these violations until months after the fact willing among constitutional which is kind of like locking the barn door after all the animals left. my friends, step back and ponder the sheer magnitu
mind the question of how complicit different companies were in the nsa scandal. that is a lit je let jet matt q. but, at same time, google is doing with that data is trying to sell you stuff for the most part. what the nsa is doing is trying to find a reason to put new jail. neil: they can take leaps with that and share that with a lot of folks, that we never intended to happen. katherine thank you very much. now to lawyer who is livid. rebecca rose woodland said that by breaking into your e-mails is breaking the law. rebecca. google says no, this is all part of what you sign up for as a g-mail user, and as a g-mail receiver. >> how can a g-mail receiver sign up anything? neil: apparently, when you open that e-mail, you become vulnerable. >> and i knew? did you know. first of all you don't distinguish where it is from, you don't accept the terms with every e-mail does a come a question, do you accept the terms of that g-mail user's account, they don't get that, if that i want to take my information, aol users all net thrown out to every e-mail user, if they want to save it they can t
back. fight back. apparently you need not be an open book, and there are ways around the nsa. who knew? i started getting all these e-mails from viewers to tell me we need not take this surveiling digital forensic analyst on how we give the fed defender. all perfectly legal. good to have you. i guess the key is just making sure that our accounts are not accessible. have you do that? >> two things. in the immediate term and long term. you have to recognize that the free and sheep service, these are not going to protect your privacy, everything you send on them and use them as an open book. so that you just need to accept. what you can do is use alternative messaging services. they do cost money, but they will increase your messages and data. i think it's important for two reasons. in the short term you protect the information, especially if your lawyer or a cow or a business person and keep the data private. neil: you are a genius. i am not. what does this mean? >> that protect the security of the law in of your mailbox. they offer this. they send the code to your phone. you also enter
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)